The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6475•Sterling L. Singleton v. PATRICIA BROWN, Lieutenant
17-6475Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 15, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6475
STERLING L. SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA BROWN, Lieutenant,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02723-JMC)
Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sterling L. Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Michael Balthazor, Roy F. Laney, RILEY,
POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sterling L. Singleton appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singleton v. Brown,
No. 9:15-cv-02723-JMC (D. S.C., Mar. 10, 2017). We deny Singleton’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.