The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6397•My’ka El v. R. REESE, Officer
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6397
MY’KA EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. REESE, Officer,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; M. SULLIVAN,
Officer; S. SELOGY, Officer; FNU MEYERS, Officer; FNU AGAPE, Officer; K.
S. KODAD, Officer; FNU ISSAC, Officer; FNU AIRTONE, Lieutenant;
S. MOBLEY; T. MOORE; T. WILSON; J. FLETCHER, Officer; J. PARKER; P.
MOORE; L.B. DIGGS; B. BUTLER; NURSE FNU GREEN, Sergeant; M. W.
WOMBLE; M. T. RETORT; B. SCAREY; T. CASTANO; FNU STOUTS,
Sergeant; R. MONROE; J. H. FRISON; R. BURNETT; BRADON JOLLY, North
Carolina State Trooper; W. L. CANTER; COOPER JERRELL, Mecklenburg
County Sheriff; FNU EASON; FNU STREET, Sergeant; FNU GANT, Sergeant;
FNU HOOD, Officer; R. CHAPMAN, Mecklenburg County Magistrate,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK)
Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
My’Ka El, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edward Peterson, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
My’Ka El appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for the
appointment of counsel and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. El v. Reese, 3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C.
Aug 18, 2016 & Feb. 28, 2017). We deny El’s motion seeking a restraining order and the
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.