The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6395•United States of America v. Ricky Lee Holloway, a/k/a Eight
17-6395Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 21, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6395
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICKY LEE HOLLOWAY, a/k/a Eight,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cr-00525-RWT-2)
Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 21, 2017
Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Lee Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States
Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Lee Holloway appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion
for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Holloway, No. 8:13-cr-00525-RWT-2 (D. Md. Feb.
24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.