The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6362•Ellis Barber v. Chief Judge Special Court of Appeals
17-6362Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 16, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6362
ELLIS BARBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHIEF JUDGE SPECIAL COURT OF APPEALS; HOWARD COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT; HOWARD COUNTY DIST COURT; HOWARD COUNTY
POLICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00554-RDB)
Submitted: July 31, 2017 Decided: August 16, 2017
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ellis Barber, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ellis Harley Barber appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Chief Judge
Special Court of Appeals, No. 1:17-cv-00554-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 1, 2017). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.