Jeffrey P. Corbin v. Federal Express, d/b/a FedEx

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2347
JEFFREY P. CORBIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, d/b/a FedEx,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MARK CLATTERBUCK, Manager Fleet Maintenance; TOM SCOTT, Sr.
Technician,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Robert John Krask, Magistrate Judge. (4:15-cv-00139-RJK)
Submitted: March 27, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey P. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. Ursula Yvette Holmes, Patrick Daniel Riederer,
Catherine C. Walsh, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Memphis, Tennessee;

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Michael R. Ward, Gibson Sinclair Wright, MCCANDLISH HOLTON, PC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey P. Corbin appeals from the judgment entered by the magistrate judge* in
his civil action for discrimination on the basis of race and disability. The November 3,
2017, judgment was entered in accordance with the jury’s verdict in favor of Federal
Express following a trial and the magistrate judge’s May 19, 2017, order granting in part
and denying in part Federal Express’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and affirm the magistrate judge’s order and judgment. Corbin v. Fed. Express,
No. 4:15-cv-00139-RJK (E.D. Va. May 19 & Nov. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

-- 3 of 3 --