The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2179•Angello A. D. Osborne v. PETER GEORGIADES, Police Corporal
17-2179Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2179
ANGELLO A. D. OSBORNE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER GEORGIADES, Police Corporal,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DIONE WHITE, LGSW; MEREDITH LYNN PIPITONE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00182-RDB)
Submitted: March 20, 2018 Decided: September 30, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angello A. D. Osborne, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Angello A. D. Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Peter Georgiades on qualified immunity grounds. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Osborne v. Georgiades, No. 1:14-cv-00182-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.