Namish Parikh v. HON. BRIAN FROSH, In his capacity as Attorney General of Maryland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2147
NAMISH PARIKH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HON. BRIAN FROSH, In his capacity as Attorney General of Maryland,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00332-GJH)
Submitted: February 28, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018
Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Namish Parikh, Appellant Pro Se. Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorney General,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Namish Parikh appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action
challenging Maryland’s prejudgment attachment procedure under the Fourth and
Fourteenth Amendments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parikh v. Frosh, No.
8:17-cv-00332-GJH (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --