The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1872•In re: John Francis Curran, Iii
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1872
In re: JOHN FRANCIS CURRAN, III,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-ct-03034-FL)
Submitted: November 1, 2017 Decided: November 8, 2017
Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John F. Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Francis Curran, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district
court has unduly delayed in acting on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay
in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.