The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1799•Anthony Spencer Green, Sr. v. DARPA, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
17-1799Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1799
ANTHONY SPENCER GREEN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DARPA, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00647-LO-JFA)
Submitted: October 10, 2017 Decided: October 18, 2017
Before KING, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Spencer Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Spencer Green, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Green’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012); Green v. DARPA, No. 1:17-cv-00647-LO-JFA (E.D. Va.
June 19, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.