The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1719•Jason A. Harbin v. Lori Partin; Julian L. Stoudemire; Stoudemire & Sprouse Law Firm Pa
17-1719Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 19, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1719
JASON A. HARBIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORI PARTIN; JULIAN L. STOUDEMIRE; STOUDEMIRE & SPROUSE LAW
FIRM PA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00575-MGL)
Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 19, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason A. Harbin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jason A. Harbin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harbin v. Partin, No. 8:17-cv-00575-
MGL (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.