The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1596•Barry J. Bluefeld v. Barry S. Cohen; Joel S. Meisel; David Cohen
17-1596Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1596
BARRY J. BLUEFELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARRY S. COHEN; JOEL S. MEISEL; DAVID COHEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02857-PX)
Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ MATKOV PC,
Wayne, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Barry J. Bluefeld appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
filed against the directors and officers of a corporation in which he is a shareholder. We
have reviewed the record as well as the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bluefeld v.
Cohen, No. 8:15-cv-02857-PX (D. Md. Apr. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.