The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1588•Kriesta L. Watson v. Shenandoah University; Board of Trustees
17-1588Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 26, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1588
KRIESTA L. WATSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY; BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BRYON GRIGSBY; MARIE LANDES; CALVIN ALLEN; KAREN ABRAHAM;
STEVEN HUMPRIES; TRACEY FITZSIMMONS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH)
Submitted: September 27, 2017 Decided: October 26, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Kriesta L. Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Jackson Huff, Paul Granger
Klockenbrink, Monica Taylor Monday, GENTRY LOCKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Kriesta L. Watson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in her
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Watson’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Watson v. Shenandoah Univ., No. 5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar.
29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.