The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1538•Fredicia Hardnett; Wilbert A. Hardnett v. M & Tbank; Atlantic Law Group; John Doe 1-10; Jane Doe 1-10
17-1538Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1538
FREDICIA HARDNETT; WILBERT A. HARDNETT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
M & T BANK; ATLANTIC LAW GROUP; JOHN DOE 1-10; JANE DOE 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00622-MHL)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fredicia Hardnett, Wilbert A. Hardnett, Appellants Pro Se. Robert Miltz Luck, III, REED
SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Fredicia Hardnett and Wilbert A. Hardnett appeal the district court’s order
dismissing their suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hardnett v. M&T Bank, No. 3:15-cv-00622-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 31 &
Sept. 19, 2016; Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.