The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1512•Thomas Garcia Singleton v. DR. EMRAN, Medical Doctor/Correct Care Solutions
17-1512Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1512
THOMAS GARCIA SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. EMRAN, Medical Doctor/Correct Care Solutions,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
C. T. WOODY, Sheriff of Richmond, VA; CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS,
Medical Company,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Thomas Garcia Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Griggs, Katherine Curie Skilling,
WIMBISH GENTILE MCCRAY & ROEBER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Garcia Singleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to
comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singleton v. Emran,
No. 3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.