The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1452•Tina M. Lymer; William J. Lymer v. the City of Clarksburg, a West Virginia Municipal Corporation
17-1452Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 3, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1452
TINA M. LYMER; WILLIAM J. LYMER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
THE CITY OF CLARKSBURG, a West Virginia Municipal Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00136-IMK)
Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Brett Offutt, LAW OFFICE OF BRETT OFFUTT, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia,
for Appellants. Keith C. Gamble, Kenneth L. Hopper, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN,
BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tina and William Lymer appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil rights
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lymer v. City of Clarksburg, No. 1:15-
cv-00136-IMK (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.