The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1300•Rona Rosemond Ansah v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
17-1300Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1300
RONA ROSEMOND ANSAH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WALMART STORES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rona Rosemond Ansah, Appellant Pro Se. John Mark Murdock, BENTON POTTER
MURDOCK, PC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rona Rosemond Ansah appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil
action for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ansah leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Ansah v. WalMart
Stores, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2017). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.