The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1139•Peter K. Stern v. United States of America
17-1139Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 14, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1139
PETER K. STERN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00329-MR)
Submitted: June 27, 2017 Decided: July 14, 2017
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Peter Kay Stern appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of
error coram nobis and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stern v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-
00329-MR (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2016 & Jan. 12, 2017). We deny as moot Stern’s
motions for final judgment on the pleadings and to expedite the decision. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.