The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1005•Ralph Stewart, Jr. v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.c.; Verbena M. Askew
17-1005Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1005
RALPH STEWART, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERBENA ASKEW LAW FIRM, P.C.; VERBENA M. ASKEW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:16-cv-00772-HEH)
Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Verbena M. Askew, City
Attorney, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ralph Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action without prejudice for lack of
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Stewart v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.C.,
No. 3:16-cv-00772-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.