The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1001•Richard Polidi v. North Carolina State Bar; John Does 1-5; Jane Does 1-5
17-1001Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1001
RICHARD POLIDI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR; JOHN DOES 1-5; JANE DOES 1-5,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01322-TSE-IDD)
Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Polidi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Polidi appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil
complaint and denying his Motion for a New Hearing. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Polidi v. North Carolina State Bar, No. 1:16-cv-01322-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct.
31, 2016; Nov. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.