The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7717•United States of America v. David A. Hicks
16-7717Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 20, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID A. HICKS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00040-1)
Submitted: July 14, 2017 Decided: July 20, 2017
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Steven Loew, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Betty Adkins Pullin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David A. Hicks appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s
motion to destroy evidence. The motion was granted in accordance with the district
court’s local rules, and Hicks offers no evidence to support his claim that the exhibits
support a claim of actual innocence. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of the
Government’s motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.