The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7581•Deanthony Doane v. HAROLD CLARKE, VDOC Director
16-7581Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 8, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7581
DEANTHONY DOANE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, VDOC Director; LESLIE FLEMING, KMCC Warden;
J. H. ROBBIN, Sergeant KMCC; C/O R. W. DOWDY, KMCC; C/O E.
M. WALK, KMCC; C/O M. CORDLE, KMCC; C/O J. SHELTON, KMCC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00539-GEC-RSB)
Submitted: March 7, 2017 Decided: March 8, 2017
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
DeAnthony Doane, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
DeAnthony Doane appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Doane v. Clarke, No.
7:14-cv-00539-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.