The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7321•Kalvin Marshall v. ROBERT E. PAYNE, Judge; HENRY E. HUDSON, Judge
16-7321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 3, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7321
KALVIN MARSHALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT E. PAYNE, Judge; HENRY E. HUDSON, Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00286-JRS)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reopen his Bivens* action which was dismissed in
April 2015. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Marshall v. Payne, No. 3:13-cv-00286-JRS (E.D.
Va. Sept. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.