The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7306•Darron Jermaine Jones v. Cranford
16-7306Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7306
DARRON JERMAINE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CRANFORD,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
HARRINGTON; ESTRIDGE; ROBERSON; SMITH; YOUNG; BARRETT;
HANSON; WARDEN; DYCUS; RIVERA,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00028-FDW)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant Cranford’s motion to dismiss Jones’ 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action against Cranford. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v.
Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016). We
deny Jones’ motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.