The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7200•United States of America v. Steven Johnson, a/k/a Tootie, a/k/a Too Low
16-7200Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 3, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7200
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN JOHNSON, a/k/a Tootie, a/k/a Too Low,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA-9)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, Jane Barrett
Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM
Steven Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir.
2013). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 3:95-cr-00488-
JFA-9 (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.