The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7162•United States of America v. Alton B. Couther, Iii
16-7162Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7162
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALTON B. COUTHER, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cr-00187-RAJ-TEM-1)
Submitted: February 15, 2017 Decided: February 22, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and THACKER, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alton B. Couther, III, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alton B. Couther, III, appeals the district court’s denial
of his motion seeking reconsideration of the district court’s
order reducing Couther’s sentence and requesting a further
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). District courts
lack jurisdiction to reconsider orders acting on § 3582(c)
motions. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36
(4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.