The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7149•Thomas Stout, Jr. v. Garner Police Department
16-7149Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7149
THOMAS STOUT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARNER POLICE DEPARTMENT; G. E. WHITE, Garner Police
Officer; PRESTON M. CHARLES, Garner Police Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03105-BO)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Stout, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dan McCord Hartzog,
Katherine Marie Barber-Jones, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Stout, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Stout v. Garner Police Dep’t, No. 5:15-ct-03105-BO
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2016). We deny Appellees’ motion to strike
Stout’s pro se supplemental brief. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.