The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7131•United States of America v. Billy R. McCullers, Jr.
16-7131Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
BILLY R. MCCULLERS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:07-cr-00049-RBS-JEB-1)
Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy R. McCullers, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine
O’Boyle, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia;
Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport
News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Billy R. McCullers, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
margin order denying his motion filed in his criminal case under
Fed R. Civ. P. 15(c)(2) to relate back a new claim to his
previously adjudicated and denied 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. McCullers, No. 4:07-cr-00049-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D.
Va. Aug. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.