The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7129•United States of America v. Wardell Jermaine McClam, Jr.
16-7129Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7129
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WARDELL JERMAINE MCCLAM, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:08-cr-00230-TDS-1)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wardell Jermaine McClam, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Harry L. Hobgood, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wardell Jermaine McClam, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. McClam, No.
1:08-cr-00230-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2016). We deny McClam’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.