The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7116•Larry James Tyler v. Eric Hodges; Wayne Byrd; Bill Nettles
16-7116Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 9, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7116
LARRY JAMES TYLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERIC HODGES; WAYNE BYRD; BILL NETTLES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(4:16-cv-01151-MGL)
Submitted: December 29, 2016 Decided: January 9, 2017
Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry James Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for the appointment of counsel, denying his
motion to amend his complaint, and accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge to dismiss without prejudice his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Tyler v. Hodges, No. 4:16-cv-01151-MGL
(D.S.C. July 27 & Aug. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.