The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6915•Rodger Hanson v. Dr. Robert Owens
16-6915Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6915
RODGER HANSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DR. ROBERT OWENS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03078-D)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodger Hanson, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Douglas Childs,
Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rodger Hanson appeals the district court’s orders granting
Defendant’s motions for summary judgment in this civil rights
action, denying Hanson’s motion to appoint counsel, and denying
his motion to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hanson’s motion
to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hanson v. Owens, No. 5:14-ct-03078-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9,
2014; Feb. 10, 2015; Oct. 16, 2015; June 20, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.