Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles Williams

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6895
MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES WILLIAMS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA)
Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Morris Speight-Bey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his original 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and opening a
new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending
below. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D.
W. Va. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --