The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6705•Angelo Marcellus Irving v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
16-6705Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 21, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6705
ANGELO MARCELLUS IRVING,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00571-JAG)
Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angelo Marcellus Irving, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Catherine
Campbell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Angelo Marcellus Irving appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reopen the time to appeal. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Irving v. Clarke, No. 3:14-cv-00571-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 29,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.