The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6492•United States of America v. Omar Jermel Dixon, a/k/a O Dixon, a/k/a Omar Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon-El,…
16-6492Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6492
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
OMAR JERMEL DIXON, a/k/a O Dixon, a/k/a Omar Dixon-El,
a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Germal Dixon, a/k/a
Omar Jermal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon El,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:02-cr-00209-JRS-1)
Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Omar Jermel Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Omar Jermel Dixon appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for reduction of his
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:02-cr-00209-JRS-1
(E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.