The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6395•Martin Walker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
16-6395Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6395
MARTIN WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; DR. PAUL MATERA, M.D.,
Individual and Official Capacity; DR. ARESAHEGN GETACHEW; DR.
MICHAEL DOUGHTY, D.P.M, individual and Official Capacity;
BRUCE FORD, P.A., Individual and Official Capacity; JUDITH
HEARTHWAY, N.P., Individual and Official Capacity; WARDEN
KATHLEEN GREEN, Individual Capacity; ASSISTANT WARDEN RONALD
DRYDEN, Individual Capacity; DR. JASON CLEM, M.D.; ROBERT
HANKE; DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CAROLYN ATKINS; S. GUSTUS,
Administrative Remedy Coordinator; C. SESSION, Administrative
Remedy Coordinators,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-
cv-01889-JKB)
Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL
& ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland; Lisa J. Russell, WARANCH &
BROWN, LLC, Lutherville, Maryland; Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE
-- 1 of 3 --
2
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Martin Walker appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Walker v. Wexford
Health Sources, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-01889-JKB (D. Md. Mar. 2, 2016).
We deny Walker’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.