The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6380•United States of America v. GEORGE EDWARD HOWARD, June
16-6380Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6380
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE EDWARD HOWARD, June,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(7:13-cr-00020-MGL-1)
Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Edward Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Edward Howard appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider its denial of a sentence reduction
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 of the
Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
refusal to reconsider. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d
233, 234-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.