The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6321•United States of America v. Hector Edgardo Ruiz-Zunigo
16-6321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 4, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6321
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HECTOR EDGARDO RUIZ-ZUNIGO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:05-cr-00039-F-1)
Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 4, 2016
Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hector Edgardo Ruiz-Zunigo, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-
Parker, Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hector Edgardo Ruiz-Zunigo appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce
his sentence under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Ruiz-Zunigo, No. 7:05-cr-00039-F-1
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.