The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6319•United States of America v. Robin A. Slagle
16-6319Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 10, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6319
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBIN A. SLAGLE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
TIMOTHY JAMES FISHER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1)
Submitted: August 9, 2016 Decided: August 10, 2016
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robin A. Slagle, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Anna Zartler Krasinski, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia;
Lynette Danae DeMasi-Lemon, Assistant United States Attorney,
Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robin A. Slagle appeals the district court’s order denying
as untimely her third-party objection to forfeiture. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Fisher, No. 3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 19, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.