The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2459•Janice Wolk Grenadier v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC
16-2459Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2459
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC;
HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R.
GALBRAITH; WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank, as
successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal
Capacities; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their
Official and Personal Capacities,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: July 27, 2017
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, BWW LAW GROUP,
LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN
SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIRE WOODS,
LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s order declining to take action on
her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v.
BWW Law Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 29, 2016;
entered Nov. 30, 2016). We deny Grenadier’s motion for an emergency injunction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.