The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2113•Daryl A. Green v. the Centech Group; Fernando V. Galaviz; Karen Strawbridge
16-2113Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 2, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2113
DARYL A. GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE CENTECH GROUP; FERNANDO V. GALAVIZ; KAREN STRAWBRIDGE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:16-cv-00753-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Philip Postol, SEYFARTH
SHAW, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daryl A. Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Green v. The Centech Grp., No. 1:16-cv-
00753-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.