The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2042•Sidney B. Harr v. N. LORRIN FREEMAN; WAKE COUNTY, in the State of North Carolina
16-2042Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2042
SIDNEY B. HARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
N. LORRIN FREEMAN; WAKE COUNTY, in the State of North
Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:16-cv-00199-FL)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr.,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sidney B. Harr appeals the district court’s order granting
N. Lorrin Freeman’s motion to dismiss Harr’s civil rights claims
against Freeman. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. See Harr v. Freeman, No. 5:16-cv-00199-FL (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.