The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2010•William Scott Davis, Jr. v. James A. Hunt
16-2010Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2010
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES A. HUNT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-cv-00035-D)
Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reconsideration in a closed
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt, No. 5:11-
cv-00035-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2016). We deny Davis’ motions to
remand and to appoint a guardian ad litem. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.