The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1980•Lisa A. Krupczak v. Dla Piper Llp (us); Unum Life Insurance Company of America
16-1980Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1980
LISA A. KRUPCZAK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DLA PIPER LLP (US); UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:16-cv-00023-WMN)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lisa A. Krupczak, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Evelyn Lewis, James
Patrick Ulwick, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Scott
Michael Trager, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lisa A. Krupczak appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss her civil action and
denying leave to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US),
No. 1:16-cv-00023-WMN (D. Md. July 27, 2016). We deny
Krupczak’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.