Michelle Riddick v. Kaiser Permanente

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1917
MICHELLE RIDDICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAISER PERMANENTE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:16-cv-00046-HEH)
Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelle Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Riddick appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice for failure to
effectuate service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Riddick’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Riddick
has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams
v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --