The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1900•Monica Jeffries v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.p.
16-1900Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1900
MONICA JEFFRIES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George J. Hazel, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-00473-GJH)
Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monica Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. Ethan Daniel Balsam, Kevin
Michael Kraham, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Monica Jeffries appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendant’s motion to dismiss her complaint alleging disability
discrimination and retaliation claims, pursuant to the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Jeffries v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 8:15-cv-00473-GJH
(D. Md. July 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.