The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1894•Ronnie Lee Alston v. THOMAS P. DORE, Substitute Trustees, et al.; CHARLES HIRSCH
16-1894Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1894
RONNIE LEE ALSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS P. DORE, Substitute Trustees, et al.; CHARLES HIRSCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-02635-GJH)
Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Dore, No. 8:15-
cv-02635-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2015, July 29, 2016). We deny
Alston’s motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.