The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1786•Robert D. Thompson v. United States of America
16-1786Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 21, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1786
ROBERT D. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-02181-RDB)
Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert D. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah A. Marquardt,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert D. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims
Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671–2680 (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. United
States, No. 1:15-cv-02181-RDB (D. Md. May 10, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.