The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1774•James Arthur Smith v. Lisa Ann Bertini
16-1774Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1774
JAMES ARTHUR SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LISA ANN BERTINI,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:15-cv-00509-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Arthur Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Teresa Morgan,
GOLIGHTLY, MULLIGAN & MORGAN, PLC, Chesapeake, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Arthur Smith appeals the district court’s order
granting Lisa Ann Bertini’s motion to dismiss Smith’s civil
complaint against Bertini. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. Smith v. Bertini, No. 2:15-cv-00509-AWA-LRL
(E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.