The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1758•Starsha Sewell v. John Howard, Sr.
16-1758Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 28, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1758
STARSHA SEWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN HOWARD, SR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-02736-JFM)
Submitted: November 14, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders
returning documents to Sewell on the ground that the case is
closed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sewell v. Howard, No. 8:12-cv-02736-JFM (D. Md.
June 14 & 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.