The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1657•Brett C. Kimberlin v. Mitch McConnell; Charles Grassley
16-1657Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 7, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1657
BRETT C. KIMBERLIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MITCH MCCONNELL; CHARLES GRASSLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George J. Hazel, District Judge.
(8:16-cv-01211-GJH)
Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: December 7, 2016
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brett C. Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for lack of standing. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kimberlin v.
McConnell, No. 8:16-cv-01211-GJH (D. Md. June 3, 2016). We deny
the motion to appoint counsel and the motion to intervene. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.