The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1653•In re: Catherine Denise Randolph
16-1653Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1653
In Re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Appellant.
No. 16-1885
In Re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge;
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369)
Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph
appeals the district court’s orders returning her complaints
because the complaints were not in compliance with the prefiling
injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accpordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.